文章所属目录-->税收新闻汇总

CBO on Fiscal Cliff Deal: $1 in Spending Cuts ($15 Billion) for Every $41 in Tax Increases ($620 Billion)

Tax News Sharing

« Campos: The Crisis of the American Law School |

Main
| Deborah Jones Merritt: Are Law Schools Like A&P and NASA? »

January 1, 2013

CBO on Fiscal Cliff Deal: $1 in Spending Cuts ($15 Billion) for Every $41 in Tax Increases ($620 Billion)

The Senate early this morning passed H.R. 8 by a vote of 89-8 to avert the fiscal cliff.  The bill now moves to the House.  Highlights of the bill include:

  • Raise the marginal tax rate to 39.6% on income over $450,000 (joint) and $400,000 (single).
  • Raise the tax rate on dividends and long term capital gains to 20% on taxpayers with income over $450,000 (joint) and $400,000 (single).  The top rate would remain 15% for taxpayers with lower incomes.
  • Estate and gift tax:  $5 million exemption (inflation-adjusted) and 40% rate.
  • Permanent and retroactive patch for the AMT.
  • Return of the exemption and itemized deduction phase-outs on taxpayers with income over $300,000 (joint) and $250,000 (single).
  • One-year extension of 50% bonus depreciation.
  • Extension of various tax extenders.

Revenue estimates from the Congressional Budget Office and Joint Committee on Taxation score the bill as adding $3.9 billion to the deficit over ten years compared to existing (January 1, 2013) law.  The White House has released this fact sheet and statement from President Obama.

Press and blogosphere coverage:

January 1, 2013 in Tax | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4eab53ef017d3f6233f8970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference CBO on Fiscal Cliff Deal: $1 in Spending Cuts ($15 Billion) for Every $41 in Tax Increases ($620 Billion):

Comments

So how does this score out? Are we looking at any serious reduction in the deficit in the near years? Or is this just kicking the can down the road?

Posted by: DonAZ | Jan 1, 2013 12:18:25 PM

Just curious, not that the courts actually care about this, but did this “H.R.” actually originate in the House? Or was it another of those “Attach an old House number to a bill the Senate wrote” deals?

Posted by: Brett Bellmore | Jan 1, 2013 12:21:44 PM

Thieves & charlatans.

Posted by: Dennis Howell | Jan 1, 2013 12:40:44 PM

So you say that the AMT patch is ‘permanent’. Does that mean that the AMT will no longer disguise the budget deficits?

Posted by: noone | Jan 1, 2013 12:47:10 PM

This may be a technicality, but is germane, especially for the point of view of conservatives. Since today is January 1, 2013, and thus the “Clinton Tax Rates” are in effect, doesn’t the Senate deal, that the House will consider, lower taxes on everyone with income less than $400/$450k; lowers the long term capital gains to 15% for income earners under $400/$450k; etc.
Isn’t the very title of HR8 (American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012) a misnomer?

Posted by: fit2post | Jan 1, 2013 12:50:48 PM

“Isn’t the very title of HR8 (American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012) a misnomer?”

Who cares ? They didn’t even read the bill before voting. I wonder if there are more “Easter eggs” in there besides the wind tax credit.

Posted by: Mike K | Jan 1, 2013 1:28:48 PM

Yet again this Administration, the Senate and the American Press will claim a victory using misinformation, deceit and outright lies….

Posted by: Chris L. | Jan 1, 2013 2:44:49 PM

Post a comment

Source Article from http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2013/01/cbo-on-fiscal-cliff-deal-.html


Copyright © 2013 Tax1on1™ 美国税1on1™ Tax One On One Inc. - All Rights Reserved
Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa